Facebook will soon use your posted content to train its AI, and opting out isn't easy

midian182

Posts: 9,835   +125
Staff member
A hot potato: Facebook will soon become the latest platform to utilize posts and photos from its users to train its AI models. People can opt out, but Meta appears to have made the process intentionally difficult and cumbersome. It's also prone to failure.

Facebook's privacy policy will change on June 26, 2024, at which point public user content – not private messages – will be used to train and improve its AI services.

Meta provides a way to object to the data scraping, but it isn't as simple as checking a box.

If you do want to opt out, first go to this help page and click on the section that states, "I want to object to or restrict the processing of my personal information from third parties used for building and improving AI at Meta."

It's then a matter of filling in your country of residence, name, surname, and email address. The form asks whether AI at Meta's models have knowledge of you. This involves providing any prompts you entered that resulted in your personal information appearing in a response from an AI at Meta model, feature or experience. Meta also asks for a screenshot proving your personal information appeared in a response from one of its AI models.

The last section is an additional context box that asks for a brief explanation of your concern and what you're requesting.

X user Tantacrul writes that Meta is also sending out notifications to users about the new AI features. You can click on this and then a "right to object" link to take you to a similar form that includes a section about "how this processing impacts you." Meta also requires users enter an OTP sent to their email address. The company claims this is for security reasons, though the fact the submission won't be sent until the code is entered suggests it's another way of trying to put people off filling in the form.

Meta's notice states that "If your objection is honored, it will be applied going forward."

Tantacrul writes that the company did honor his objection, but many of his friends and Reddit users who also objected received an error message when trying to submit the form.

Scraping user content to train AI models is becoming a standard practice these days. OpenAI partnered with Reddit earlier this month to put users' posts in ChatGPT.

Permalink to story:

 
Facebook is about to have some of the dumbest and most unhinged AI on the market. I'm unironically looking forward to seeing the results.
 
That type of requirements will be a disaster for old people to fill and complete all forms correctly. I guess I'll have to delete every pictures on my FB and remind my family to do the same.
So now by using Facebook, we will not have any privacy of any information or pictures that we upload, even when we put it in Only me mode ? I think it's time to find another platform
 
Most people just don't give a damn no matter how many times behaviour like this is reported.
They willingly give up every last morsel of their privacy to be sold on to commercial interests.
 
This may have regional variants for the opt-out process. In the UK we just a simple yes/no option without needing to jump through any annoying hoops. The only hiccup is the awkward wording of the opt-out spiel that says "if we honour your request", as if to suggest that it's only an illusion of choice. However they confirmed the opt-out by email so now I have no reason to believe I'll see elements of my photos appearing in Meta AI output. They can go to town on the verbal tripe I've posted over the last 15 years though, knowing all along that they were selling it left and right and thus trolling the algorithms the whole time :D
 
If I set "Public", all friends and non-friends can see my content.
If I set "Friends", my posts can only be seen by friends, so it's private messages to only them.
Shouldn't that prevent my content from being used by their AI ?!?!

I know "Only Me" works. That's actually my default so I can see my post before anyone else and can fix up misspellings or anything else that didn't turn out the way I expected. Then I set it to "Friends". I never set anything to "Public".
 
How about being smarter than the social media platform, and simply not using it? Na, you stupid plastic *****s aren't that smart. You're getting just what you deserve by using Facebook!
 
I mean before this AI hype, it is no secret that Meta was already happily scrapping data from their social media platforms. What surprised me was the choice of data sources that these companies are training their AIs. Like I am not surprise to see a bunch of rubbish written in social media. So feeding garbage into the model is going to give you garbage as an output. Case in point, Google's AI sharing the "secret" to add some non-toxic glue to food. You can put in guard rails for data quality, but again, when you have a massive bunch of garbage going into the model, there will always be garbage coming out of it.
 
"I want to object to or restrict the processing of my personal information from third parties used for building and improving AI at Meta." is not an option on that page for me in the US
 
And the loop of AI learning from AI starts quickly:
I post some news for the place where I work, and I "use" AI to write those articles, so they want AI to learn from AI content, good luck for you Meta
 
Back