Valve confirms your Steam account cannot be transferred to anyone after you die

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 399   +2
Staff
WTF?! Since its inception more than two decades ago, Steam has become the go-to game distribution platform for PC gamers with more than 132 million monthly active users, according to the latest data. Unfortunately for all these gamers, they won't be able to hand down their Steam library to anyone when they die.

The confirmation came from the Steam support staff earlier this month when Resetera forum user delete12345 asked Steam support if he can put his Steam library in his will. Unfortunately for him, the staffer replied that Steam accounts and games are non-transferable and users cannot provide someone else with access to the account or merge its contents with another account. "I regret to inform you that your Steam account cannot be transferred via a will," he was told.

The gaming community has expressed its collective frustration at the news, with many wondering if there are workarounds that will allow their loved ones to access their games once they pass on. Others, however, have reacted to the news with nonchalance, saying that the policy can be easily bypassed by simply giving another user the login credentials. The inheritor can then change the payment card and other details without notifying Steam about the change in the account ownership.

While this looks like a plausible way to bypass Steam's restrictive policies, some users have pointed out that this could only be a short-term solution. According to them, an account being in use past the length of a person's average lifespan could trigger investigations by Steam. Once they determine that the original user is dead or no longer in charge of the account, it could even be terminated as per the company's terms and conditions.

It remains to be seen if Steam will change its policy on this matter in the future, but as long as the current terms are in place, gamers will not be able to transfer their account to anyone, at least not officially. This issue also highlights the underlying problem with digital purchases in general, something that came under scrutiny more than a decade ago when actor Bruce Willis learned that he could not bequeath his extensive iTunes music collection to his daughters.

It is worth noting here that Valve recently announced a new feature that allows Steam users to share games with their friends and family. Dubbed "Steam Families," it is currently in the testing phase and only available on Steam beta clients. Once it leaves beta, it is expected to be implemented across the entire Steam ecosystem and replace the current Steam Family Sharing and Steam Family View features.

Permalink to story:

 
Come on governments, wake the f*ck up and start laying down the law here.

Imagine dying, your will is simple, just says “give everything to my wife”, she gets the house, the car, the money in the bank, and the debts as well of course, but digitally purchased games? Nope…

Soon Nissan ask for their car back as the original owner has died, soon the estate agent kicks you out of your own house because the person on the paperwork has died… you wouldn’t let either of those things happen… yet government seem to just, not care when it’s digital goods?
 
I have a feeling Steam isn't going to go out of it's way to track an account's age or use. Keep in mind there are company accounts (which are not differentiated) which can be expected to be used by many others, and for a long time.
As long as it still means people buy new games, I don't see this private company putting profits over consumers like a public company would.

But I hope Valve sees how dumb this looks to consumers and decides to update the policy, publishers be d@mned...
...Assuming it's not a nightmare for people who have their accounts stolen and whatnot.
 
Come on governments, wake the f*ck up and start laying down the law here.

Imagine dying, your will is simple, just says “give everything to my wife”, she gets the house, the car, the money in the bank, and the debts as well of course, but digitally purchased games? Nope…

Soon Nissan ask for their car back as the original owner has died, soon the estate agent kicks you out of your own house because the person on the paperwork has died… you wouldn’t let either of those things happen… yet government seem to just, not care when it’s digital goods?
The difference is, you actually own your house and car so no one can take them away. You do not own your games on Steam, you just have a license to play them. Not saying I agree with it, after all if you buy a game on a physical disc you can resell that disc even though you still don't own the software that is on it. I think this is something that will have to be settled in court eventually.
 
Come on governments, wake the f*ck up and start laying down the law here.

Imagine dying, your will is simple, just says “give everything to my wife”, she gets the house, the car, the money in the bank, and the debts as well of course, but digitally purchased games? Nope…

Soon Nissan ask for their car back as the original owner has died, soon the estate agent kicks you out of your own house because the person on the paperwork has died… you wouldn’t let either of those things happen… yet government seem to just, not care when it’s digital goods?
Time to start reading those contracts you agree to during transactions to learn what you are actually buying.
 
He said. Who said we can't change it legally? Last time I checked, digital goods often cost times more than food and daily necessities. Those must be fully transferable. But they will get away with doing this for as long as nobody says anything
 
So my kids won't be able to play the 4000 games I purchased? Neither will their children? They gotta rebuy them again? ;p Starting to smell like Nintendo lol. If you can't transfer your account to others, that's kind of sucky.
 
As several have mentioned, just put your login info into your will. Transfer complete and it's what I've done. Steam will never know - or spend the resources - to realize it's not you.
 
Public policy takes a long time to catch up, especially for an issue like this that has not yet become timely for large chunks of the population.

I'm not sure even the non-transferrable while alive is consistent with at least the US historical approach to the economy, that ought to be looked at too at which point the transfer-on-death aspect would be clearer.
 
There are two angles here: one from the perspective of the "inactive user," and the other, of course, is the possibility of someone who knew you knowing you had departed wanting to have your game library/account.
 
I have a feeling Steam isn't going to go out of it's way to track an account's age or use.

it isn't going out of their way. Script like that can be written in under 1 minute....and scheduled to run daily, forever.
 
Part of the reason I've turned to patient gaming: I'd rather enjoy and experience my games rather than clutching onto some sort of "collection" or "legacy" that can disappear at any time.

Also, this idea of "passing things down"... I look at all the crap my parents have built up over a lifetime and really what I see if 95% stuff I'm going to have to put a lot of work into either selling/giving/throwing away. I fully intend to "lean up" as I get older and throw away a bunch of stuff unless my kids specifically ask for me to keep it.

It's strange to me that people think their kids and grandkids are somehow going to play any of the 4000 games that they won't even play today.

I also have a big collection of CDs from back when and even though it's my own stuff and I have a ton of nostalgia I don't even go back and play my old pre-digital games. I had my time with them and now they're done.
 
"an account being in use past the length of a person's average lifespan could trigger investigations by Steam. Once they determine that the original user is dead or no longer in charge of the account, it could even be terminated as per the company's terms and conditions."

So this becomes a theoretical issue in....30, 50, 80 years depending on your age and the account age? Who cares?
 
it isn't going out of their way. Script like that can be written in under 1 minute....and scheduled to run daily, forever.
Yeah, you're not a programmer. No one would go out of their way to script a hypothetical like that, especially one that takes 80+ years to trigger 😂
Programmers have better things to think about...
 
Back