World's "largest" air vacuum fires up in Iceland, will suck CO2 from air and bury it

zohaibahd

Posts: 124   +1
Staff
Why it matters: A new plant that sucks planet-warming carbon dioxide straight out of the air like a massive vacuum cleaner began operations this week in HellisheiðI, Iceland. And this thing is no joke – it's being billed as the largest direct air capture facility on the planet.

The "Mammoth" plant is the latest creation from Swiss firm Climeworks. As the name suggests, it dwarfs the company's previous effort in Iceland – the Orca plant, which started running in 2021. Mammoth has a planned capacity ten times greater than its little sibling.

The plant, which started running on May 8, essentially works by inhaling atmospheric air and running it through chemical filters that trap the CO2 molecules. The captured carbon dioxide can then be buried deep underground or used to create carbon-based products, according to CNN.

In Mammoth's case, the climate culprit gases will be pumped into rock formations where they'll be mineralized into solid stone – permanently locking the carbon away. Climeworks is teaming up with Icelandic firm Carbfix on this carbon sequestration process, taking advantage of Iceland's plentiful geothermal energy to power the whole operation with clean electricity.

"Climeworks broke ground on Mammoth in June 2022. Only 18 months later, the core pieces of the plant have been built. The rest of 2024 will be dedicated to completing the plant's buildout, adding the remaining 60 CO2 collector containers, and ramping up its operations. This phased initiation underscores Climeworks' flagship modular technology design, facilitating the construction of plants of varying sizes," the company said.

A sobering study from last year projected global CO2 emissions hitting new records, growing 1-2% from burning fossil fuels – far short of the steep reductions needed. Researchers warned the world remains on track to overshoot the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C target, calling for urgent action as climate impacts intensify. Many experts insist we need to start actively scrubbing existing CO2 from the air, not just curbing new emissions.

Direct air capture is still highly expensive and energy-intensive compared to cutting emissions at the source. There are also concerns that the technology could give policymakers an excuse not to pursue difficult decarbonization policies, the report states.

Those concerns aside, Climeworks is doubling down on the promise of direct air capture. At full capacity, the modular Mammoth system with its 72 carbon collector units will be able to pull around 36,000 tons of CO2 per year out of the atmosphere.

And that's just the first step. Company reps say they aim to reach carbon removal costs of $300-350 per ton by 2030, down from over $1,000 currently. Their target is making it cheap enough at $100/ton to deploy direct air capture on a massive scale by 2050. That should help achieve the ambitious 1 billion tons of carbon removal per year by 2050 across a series of global plants.

Permalink to story:

 
.... we have UNLIMTED SUNLIGHT to convert to energy to that use to convert CO2 to oxygen chemically, with high energy lasers, artificial photosynthesis etc ..... but yeah ... lets bury things like we did in the dark ages instead of using captured carbon to build carbon nano-blocks, nano-tubes, nano-rods etc. :|
 
.... we have UNLIMTED SUNLIGHT to convert to energy to that use to convert CO2 to oxygen chemically, with high energy lasers, artificial photosynthesis etc ..... but yeah ... lets bury things like we did in the dark ages instead of using captured carbon to build carbon nano-blocks, nano-tubes, nano-rods etc. :|
OR...instead of a bunch of neo new age nonsense from a textbook, we could just....put it back underground where it came from?
Props to the snake oil salesmen that came up with this idea.

Make no mistake, people will go where the money is and fill whatever need to get that money.
Carbon recapturing is snake oil now.

The more you know.
 
Remember back then we grew more trees to take out CO2. But then we cut down more trees to clear up spaces for more developing. Also, planning trees can't put more money back into their pockets.
 
Playing chemist or, dare I say, alchemist is never a good idea. CO2 could react with other elements and create other elements that influence the pH level.

This is another desperate attempt to try to solve a problem without focusing on the root cause.
 
Search for "Climate: The Movie" on Vimeo. Then look at historical temperature and rain records (50y+, not 10-20 as quoted by most journalists).
 
Search for "Climate: The Movie" on Vimeo. Then look at historical temperature and rain records (50y+, not 10-20 as quoted by most journalists).

Instead of having to watch it, can you give us a summary of what we're supposed to learn from it?
 
What trees?
Last time I checked we keep cutting them down at a faster rate than they can grow.
You're confused. The US is more heavily forested today than it was in the year 1900 -- primarily because of modern agricultural methods that allow us to now grow food for 350 million people on less land than we once used to grow food for 1/4 that population.

Worldwide, if you ignore just the two nations of Brazil and Indonesia, total forested area is increasing annually.
 
I love that there is no mention of this machine's effective radius. Can it cleanse 1000 sq.mi of air, or 10? How quickly? These and many other answers would go a long way in understanding its usefulness, if there is any.
 
Attach the words "Climate or Climate Change" to anything and you'll receive money too. All these initiatives sound good but no one thinks how long these projects will last or be around. Will this plant be around till 2050? Money will be the deciding factor. Trees once planted and grows are maintenance free and will last 100s of years.
 
I think if they just use their brains, Tree's Grass all green plants absorb Co2, they create clean air, they filter for free, they also produce fruits depending on what you plant....
I think science and money should never mix like this...
Wana know who a politician is helping...look who is paying him the most
 
Back